Sadiq Khan’s hated ULEZ expansion generated £5.3million in its first week after another 300,000 drivers were hit with fines for flouting scheme’s rules, data reveals
Published: 07:33, 4 December 2023 | Updated: 07:59, 4 December 2023
Sadiq Khan[2]‘s controversial ULEZ[3] expansion generated GBP5.3million in its first week with 300,000 extra drivers charged for driving non-compliant vehicles within Greater London[4].
More than 425,000 ULEZ charges were paid in the week following the extension, compared to just 140,000 the week before.
The scheme, designed to limit harmful pollution, means that anyone with a non-compliant vehicle has to pay a daily GBP12.50 fee to drive within London – or a larger fine if this is not paid.
Most petrol[5] cars registered before 2006 and diesel cars registered before 2015 are non-compliant.
It comes as police face anti-ULEZ activists vandalising or stealing cameras in record numbers, with almost 1,000 offences recorded between April 1 and October 31 this year.
Just two people had been charged in relation to the offences, the Met said last month.
Sadiq Khan’s controversial ULEZ expansion generated GBP5.3million in its first week with 300,000 extra drivers charged for driving non-compliant vehicles within Greater London
The new data was revealed in Freedom of Information Requests from the Times[6], and showed that 284,000 extra charges were paid in just the first week, from August 29.
Research by car marketplace Motorway previously showed that 16 percent of Londoners, or around 714,000 people, own a vehicle that is not compliant with the ULEZ restrictions.
Motorway co-founder Alex Buttle told the Times: ‘With the continued cost of living crisis and the recent expansion of London’s Ulez, more drivers who use the zone are questioning their driving habits.
‘We know from our research that the financial implications are causing concern among drivers in London and the surrounding areas.’
Previously, the ULEZ zone had been restricted to a large area of central London, but the expansion meant it now covers all of Greater London.
Its boundaries now extend into Hertfordshire, Essex, Kent, Surrey and Buckinghamshire.
The data comes as Transport for London (TfL) was accused of ‘misleading’ the public[7] over the benefits of the scheme.
The new data was revealed in Freedom of Information Requests from the Times , and showed that 284,000 extra charges were paid in just the first week, from August 29
Ulez cameras have been attacked nearly 1,000 times in just seven months, shocking figures reveal
Activists opposed to Mr Khan’s flagship policy – which recently expanded to cover the entire city – have attacked hundreds of static cameras
The advertising watchdog launched an investigation earlier this year after hundreds of people complained that the Mayor of London’s transport authority exaggerated the extent to which the scheme had improved air quality.
Now, the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) report is set to criticise ‘misleading’ claims about the expansion of Ulez reducing levels of nitrogen dioxide (NO2).
A draft ASA report specifies these claims going out in Tfl’s radio and newspaper advertisements.
Recommendations in the report allegedly suggest that two complaints about two radio adverts and one in a newspaper are to be upheld.
Following the ASA’s investigation, it suggests two adverts were ‘misleading’ because they ‘did not clarify’ claims NO2 levels had ‘reduced by nearly half’ as a result of Ulez, and were based on ‘estimates or modelled scenarios’ and not ‘actual figures’.
Anger against the scheme has been bubbling up for some time, with 987 recorded crimes concerning ULEZ cameras from April to October.
The Met Police recorded 220 reports of cameras being stolen and 767 cameras being damaged, but arrested just five people.
Just two have been charged.
A statement from the force said: ‘The Met continues to treat criminal activity in relation to ULEZ seriously and has deployed considerable resources to our operation.
‘Where there are possible lines of enquiry, local investigators will follow up using a range of investigative approaches including CCTV trawls, witness searches and an assessment of forensic opportunities.’
References
- ^ Elizabeth Haigh (www.dailymail.co.uk)
- ^ Sadiq Khan (www.dailymail.co.uk)
- ^ ULEZ (www.dailymail.co.uk)
- ^ London (www.dailymail.co.uk)
- ^ petrol (www.dailymail.co.uk)
- ^ Times (www.thetimes.co.uk)
- ^ accused of ‘misleading’ the public (www.thetimes.co.uk)